On a side note, finally being able to play with something like PRMan in Blender is giving me a major geekgasm. Cycles is faster on smaller scenes, but suffers major slowdowns and memory issues once you start using heavy geometry, hair and motion blur (something the Gooseberry team is very well aware of), whereas engines like Arnold and PRMan handle the complexity much more efficiently. One of Arnold’s developers said essentially the same thing. Related Topics Blender 3D computer graphics software Software Information & communications technology Technology comments sorted. It took almost 30 minutes for me to render the cornell box demo scene to a good level in PRMan, whereas Cycles probably would’ve banged it out a lot quicker. Blender is an awesome open-source software for 3D modelling, animation, rendering and more. This took me like a month to do, it is my first animation btw. PRMan is designed for the types of scenes they generate for movies: lots of big textures, massive amounts of geometry, motion blur, etc… Engines with this focus generally don’t do very well on smaller scenes. Pixar Intro Remake on Blender Decided to share this here, I made this animation 2 months ago and only showed it to my friends and in a small community.

I created this video with Blender 2.67b and Adobe After Effect CS6. I’m wondering why when I tested renderman before it was so slow. Pixar Intro - Blender 2.67b & Adobe After Effects CS6 (Free Templates) Full HD Pixar Intro - Ble. What’s your spec and render times for that. Pitiwazu it looks like denoise is doing a smart blur like in photoshop.

Custom pixar intro blender